Статья посвящена сравнительно-сопоставительному анализу именной лексики эвенкийского и монгольских языков. Целью являются определение некоторых закономерностей адаптации заимствованных монгольских прилагательных в эвенкийском языке, выявление общих и заимствованных прилагательных структурно близких языков - эвенкийского и монгольских, появившихся в результате их исторического взаимодействия. Предпринята попытка определить конкретный язык-источник заимствования, охарактеризовать лексико-семантические группы прилагательных. Источниками послужили диалектологические словари эвенкийского и монгольских языков, этнографические и исторические материалы. Выделены предполагаемый общеалтайский пласт прилагательных в эвенкийском языке, общий монголо-тунгусо-маньчжурский пласт лексики на материале прилагательных.
The scientific novelty of the study is in the fact that for the first time an attempt was made to conduct a comparative analysis of the nominal vocabulary of the Evenk and Mongolian languages. The relevance of this article is indisputable it is determined by the lack of knowledge of the vocabulary of the Evenk and Mongolian languages in a comparative aspect. The purpose of the article is to identify common and borrowed adjectives of structurally similar languages - the Evenk and Mongolian languages, which appeared as a result of their historical interaction, as well as to determine the specific language - the source of borrowing; consider lexical-semantic groups of adjectives. The research is conducted on the basis of comparative analysis. The sources of the article were dialectological dictionaries of the Evenk and Mongolian languages, ethnographic and historical materials. The supposed common Altai layer of adjectives in the Evenk language is highlighted; common Mongol-Tungus-Manchu layer of vocabulary based on the adjectives. As you can see, the vocabulary of the Evenk language contains a large number of Buryatisms and Mongolisms that were included at different times. The proposed list of lexical borrowings is not exhaustive, their maximum expansion and etymological analysis were not the main aim of the study. When identifying borrowed adjectives, cultural and economic influences were taken into account.